top of page

Practice the World language pedagogy test- Essay

  • Writer: Mu Mei Hsueh
    Mu Mei Hsueh
  • Sep 1, 2023
  • 2 min read

Updated: Nov 6, 2023

Read the following question and write an essay on the topic given. Write your response in the space provided.

Make sure that your essay includes reasons and/or examples to support your opinion.

Manage your time so that you have enough time to plan, write, and revise your essay. Typically, an effective essay will contain a minimum of 150 words.

(The above information was cited from the World Languages Pedagogy (5841) Practice Test)


Problems:

  1. The rubric doesn't include enough details to offer a meaning feedback to support students' improvement. For example, the Pronunciation could include the tone and phonics. The purpose of language is for communication. As a result, the rubric should also offer the details to explant if the mistake would effect peoples' understanding.

  2. Range and accuracy issue, some criteria only assess the range but not accuracy, some of the others are opposite.

  3. According to the rubric, students who make "No mistakes" can get the highest score, but this may cause fixed-mindset and other negative affections during the learning progress. For instance, a student may tend to choose simple, easy language in order to make fewer mistakes. On the other hand, a student that takes more risks by using a wider range of language features is more likely to make mistakes, but the quality of their communication is also likely to be higher.


*According to this rubric, if a student makes no mistakes with grammar or pronunciation, then they can receive the highest grade, but this ignores important aspects of communication. For instance, a student that takes more risks by using a wider range of language features is more likely to make mistakes, but the quality of their communication is also likely to be higher than a student who took no risks but made fewer errors.


Suggestions:

  • Using positive sentence: I would suggest to change the "Mistakes" and "No mistakes" to "Need to improve" and "Excellent", also add "Good" and "Fair" between.

  • Add more details below the criteria numbers : Such as "the grammar mistakes cause the listener not able to understand the meaning at all", "some grammar mistakes may cause the listener to misunderstand the meaning", "there are some grammar mistakes, but they do not affect peoples' understanding of the content meaning".

  • Consider risk-taking to encourage students to try to use more complex language and learn from their mistakes to delivery the growth-mindset.


Other recourse:


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
CALLA 與 CALP 的關係 (CALLA & CALP)

1. 核心關係圖解:目的地與交通工具 如果把學術英語能力比喻成登山: CALP (目的地/山頂):  是學生必須到達的高度。這是一種去情境化 (context-reduced)、認知需求高 (cognitively demanding) 的語言能力。 CALLA (登山裝備與技巧):  是幫助學生爬上去的具體方法。它不只是教學生「走」 (語言),還教學生「如何調節呼吸、如何使用登山杖」 ( 學習策

 
 
 
教學模式與方法 (Instructional Delivery Models & Methods)

這是一份關於「教學模式 (Instructional Delivery Models)」的詳細解說與範例對照,包含英文與中文,幫助你更具體地理解這些概念在考試與教學現場的應用。 1. 入班支援 (Push-in) Explanation (解說): The ESL teacher enters the general education classroom to provide support

 
 
 

Comments


©2022 by MU MEI, HSUEH. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page